Review



vamp4 sequence  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc vamp4 sequence
    Figure 2. VAMP2 is detected preferentially in fusion events (puffs) delivering MOR to the surface. (A) Schematic of a VAMP2+ puff in SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells. When a vesicle carrying both SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji fuses to the plasma membrane, the fluorescence intensity increases in both the SpH channel and the pHuji channel. (B) Montage of a SpH-MOR puff colocalizing with VAMP2-pHuji (SpH-MOR in green and VAMP2-pHuji in magenta) from SpH-MOR and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells 5 min after DAMGO treatment at 37°C. Scale bar = 2 µm. (C) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-MOR (cyan) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2+ puff of the SpH-MOR expressing cells. (D) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-B2AR (red) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2-negative puff of the SpH-B2AR expressing cells. (E) Quantification of VAMP enrichment in the population of puffs for each SpH-cargo. VAMP2 or <t>VAMP4</t> enrichment of individual puff event was calculated as the fold change of VAMP-pHuji fluorescence at the peak of the event over baseline SD, as described in the text (median ± 95% confidence interval [CI]; TfR-SpH: 2 cells, puff = 85; SpH-B2AR: 3 cells, puff = 85; SpH-MOR-VAMP2: 3 cells, puff = 59; SpH-MOR-VAMP4: 4 cells, puff = 44; all conditions from two independent experiments). SpH-MOR puffs showed significantly more enrichment of VAMP2 compared with other cargos, but showed no VAMP4 enrichment (one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Kruskal–Wallis test: TfR vs. B2AR: P > 0.9999; TfR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; B2AR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; MOR- VAMP2 vs. MOR-VAMP4: P < 0.0001). (F) The fraction of VAMP2+ puffs (% population) as defined by different folds of VAMP2 enrichment over baseline SD (cutoff) shows a consistent enrichment of VAMP2 preferentially in MOR puffs across all cutoffs. (G) Kernel density estimation of the pooled population of all puffs to estimate subclasses. The best fit predicted three subclasses based on VAMP2 enrichment. Three Gaussian mixture models of the actual distribution (solid line) and predicted subclasses (dashed lines) are shown. (H) Fraction of puffs in each predicted subclass shows distinct population composition of different SpH-cargos and a preferential enrichment of VAMP2+ subclasses in SpH-MOR puffs.
    Vamp4 Sequence, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 7 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vamp4 sequence/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 7 article reviews
    vamp4 sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 is a cargo-selective v-SNARE for a subset of GPCRs."

    Article Title: Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 is a cargo-selective v-SNARE for a subset of GPCRs.

    Journal: The Journal of cell biology

    doi: 10.1083/jcb.202207070

    Figure 2. VAMP2 is detected preferentially in fusion events (puffs) delivering MOR to the surface. (A) Schematic of a VAMP2+ puff in SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells. When a vesicle carrying both SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji fuses to the plasma membrane, the fluorescence intensity increases in both the SpH channel and the pHuji channel. (B) Montage of a SpH-MOR puff colocalizing with VAMP2-pHuji (SpH-MOR in green and VAMP2-pHuji in magenta) from SpH-MOR and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells 5 min after DAMGO treatment at 37°C. Scale bar = 2 µm. (C) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-MOR (cyan) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2+ puff of the SpH-MOR expressing cells. (D) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-B2AR (red) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2-negative puff of the SpH-B2AR expressing cells. (E) Quantification of VAMP enrichment in the population of puffs for each SpH-cargo. VAMP2 or VAMP4 enrichment of individual puff event was calculated as the fold change of VAMP-pHuji fluorescence at the peak of the event over baseline SD, as described in the text (median ± 95% confidence interval [CI]; TfR-SpH: 2 cells, puff = 85; SpH-B2AR: 3 cells, puff = 85; SpH-MOR-VAMP2: 3 cells, puff = 59; SpH-MOR-VAMP4: 4 cells, puff = 44; all conditions from two independent experiments). SpH-MOR puffs showed significantly more enrichment of VAMP2 compared with other cargos, but showed no VAMP4 enrichment (one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Kruskal–Wallis test: TfR vs. B2AR: P > 0.9999; TfR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; B2AR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; MOR- VAMP2 vs. MOR-VAMP4: P < 0.0001). (F) The fraction of VAMP2+ puffs (% population) as defined by different folds of VAMP2 enrichment over baseline SD (cutoff) shows a consistent enrichment of VAMP2 preferentially in MOR puffs across all cutoffs. (G) Kernel density estimation of the pooled population of all puffs to estimate subclasses. The best fit predicted three subclasses based on VAMP2 enrichment. Three Gaussian mixture models of the actual distribution (solid line) and predicted subclasses (dashed lines) are shown. (H) Fraction of puffs in each predicted subclass shows distinct population composition of different SpH-cargos and a preferential enrichment of VAMP2+ subclasses in SpH-MOR puffs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. VAMP2 is detected preferentially in fusion events (puffs) delivering MOR to the surface. (A) Schematic of a VAMP2+ puff in SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells. When a vesicle carrying both SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji fuses to the plasma membrane, the fluorescence intensity increases in both the SpH channel and the pHuji channel. (B) Montage of a SpH-MOR puff colocalizing with VAMP2-pHuji (SpH-MOR in green and VAMP2-pHuji in magenta) from SpH-MOR and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells 5 min after DAMGO treatment at 37°C. Scale bar = 2 µm. (C) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-MOR (cyan) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2+ puff of the SpH-MOR expressing cells. (D) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-B2AR (red) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2-negative puff of the SpH-B2AR expressing cells. (E) Quantification of VAMP enrichment in the population of puffs for each SpH-cargo. VAMP2 or VAMP4 enrichment of individual puff event was calculated as the fold change of VAMP-pHuji fluorescence at the peak of the event over baseline SD, as described in the text (median ± 95% confidence interval [CI]; TfR-SpH: 2 cells, puff = 85; SpH-B2AR: 3 cells, puff = 85; SpH-MOR-VAMP2: 3 cells, puff = 59; SpH-MOR-VAMP4: 4 cells, puff = 44; all conditions from two independent experiments). SpH-MOR puffs showed significantly more enrichment of VAMP2 compared with other cargos, but showed no VAMP4 enrichment (one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Kruskal–Wallis test: TfR vs. B2AR: P > 0.9999; TfR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; B2AR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; MOR- VAMP2 vs. MOR-VAMP4: P < 0.0001). (F) The fraction of VAMP2+ puffs (% population) as defined by different folds of VAMP2 enrichment over baseline SD (cutoff) shows a consistent enrichment of VAMP2 preferentially in MOR puffs across all cutoffs. (G) Kernel density estimation of the pooled population of all puffs to estimate subclasses. The best fit predicted three subclasses based on VAMP2 enrichment. Three Gaussian mixture models of the actual distribution (solid line) and predicted subclasses (dashed lines) are shown. (H) Fraction of puffs in each predicted subclass shows distinct population composition of different SpH-cargos and a preferential enrichment of VAMP2+ subclasses in SpH-MOR puffs.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane, Fluorescence

    Figure 3. VAMP2 depletion inhibits the recycling of SpH-MOR but not that of SpH-B2AR and TfR-SpH. (A) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shScramble-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment. (B) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shVAMP2-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment, showing depletion of VAMP2. Scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Scatter plots of normalized IDoT of VAMP2 immunostaining in shScramble-tagBFP (shScramble) or shVAMP2-tagBFP (shVAMP2) expressing cells (median ± 95% CI, n = 45 or 46 cells, respectively, from two independent experiments), showing depletion of VAMP2 in the latter (P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t test). (D) The number of TfR-SpH puffs per cell per minute (/cell • min) in cells expressing either TfR-SpH alone (Dox alone) or in cells co- expressing shScramble or shVAMP2, treated with 48 h of Dox, show no significant difference (Dox alone: n = 11; shScramble: n = 10; shVAMP2: n = 10, from two independent experiments; one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (E) A similar comparison shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-B2AR puffs across the three conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble + Dox: n = 24; shVamp2 + Dox: n = 36, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (F) A similar comparison shows significant reduction in the number of SpH-MOR puffs in cells co-expressing shVAMP2 compared with the other two conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble: n = 23; shVAMP2: n = 28, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (G) A similar comparison in cells co-expressing SpH-MOR and shScramble or VAMP4 shRNA (shVAMP4), shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-MOR puffs (shScramble, n = 15; shVAMP2, n = 13, from one experiment, unpaired two-tailed t test, checked by power analysis). Cells from E–G were treated with agonists for 5 min at 37°C before imaging. Filled dots in red from E–G represented outliers identified by the Tukey plot that were included in the statistical analysis. “+” in the Tukey plots from D–G represented mean. (H) Schematic of the treatment and labeling conditions for the flow cytometry assay. Cells were labeled with M1-Alexa-647 (M1-647) antibody at the endpoint of treatment conditions to measure surface MOR levels: at baseline (NT), after DAMGO for 20 min at 37°C (T), or after washing out DAMGO and incubating in Naltrexone for 20 min at 37°C (WO). (I) Representative histograms of PC12 cells co-expressing FLAG-MOR and shVAMP2, either without (shVAMP2 −Dox) or with (shVAMP2 +Dox) pretreatment of Dox for 48 h. (J) Quantification of mean (left panel) and geometric mean (geomean, right panel) of surface MOR levels normalized to unlabeled baseline (±SEM, three samples each condition from one experiment).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. VAMP2 depletion inhibits the recycling of SpH-MOR but not that of SpH-B2AR and TfR-SpH. (A) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shScramble-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment. (B) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shVAMP2-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment, showing depletion of VAMP2. Scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Scatter plots of normalized IDoT of VAMP2 immunostaining in shScramble-tagBFP (shScramble) or shVAMP2-tagBFP (shVAMP2) expressing cells (median ± 95% CI, n = 45 or 46 cells, respectively, from two independent experiments), showing depletion of VAMP2 in the latter (P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t test). (D) The number of TfR-SpH puffs per cell per minute (/cell • min) in cells expressing either TfR-SpH alone (Dox alone) or in cells co- expressing shScramble or shVAMP2, treated with 48 h of Dox, show no significant difference (Dox alone: n = 11; shScramble: n = 10; shVAMP2: n = 10, from two independent experiments; one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (E) A similar comparison shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-B2AR puffs across the three conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble + Dox: n = 24; shVamp2 + Dox: n = 36, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (F) A similar comparison shows significant reduction in the number of SpH-MOR puffs in cells co-expressing shVAMP2 compared with the other two conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble: n = 23; shVAMP2: n = 28, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (G) A similar comparison in cells co-expressing SpH-MOR and shScramble or VAMP4 shRNA (shVAMP4), shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-MOR puffs (shScramble, n = 15; shVAMP2, n = 13, from one experiment, unpaired two-tailed t test, checked by power analysis). Cells from E–G were treated with agonists for 5 min at 37°C before imaging. Filled dots in red from E–G represented outliers identified by the Tukey plot that were included in the statistical analysis. “+” in the Tukey plots from D–G represented mean. (H) Schematic of the treatment and labeling conditions for the flow cytometry assay. Cells were labeled with M1-Alexa-647 (M1-647) antibody at the endpoint of treatment conditions to measure surface MOR levels: at baseline (NT), after DAMGO for 20 min at 37°C (T), or after washing out DAMGO and incubating in Naltrexone for 20 min at 37°C (WO). (I) Representative histograms of PC12 cells co-expressing FLAG-MOR and shVAMP2, either without (shVAMP2 −Dox) or with (shVAMP2 +Dox) pretreatment of Dox for 48 h. (J) Quantification of mean (left panel) and geometric mean (geomean, right panel) of surface MOR levels normalized to unlabeled baseline (±SEM, three samples each condition from one experiment).

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunostaining, Two Tailed Test, Comparison, shRNA, Imaging, Labeling, Flow Cytometry



    Similar Products

    93
    Addgene inc vamp4 sequence
    Figure 2. VAMP2 is detected preferentially in fusion events (puffs) delivering MOR to the surface. (A) Schematic of a VAMP2+ puff in SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells. When a vesicle carrying both SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji fuses to the plasma membrane, the fluorescence intensity increases in both the SpH channel and the pHuji channel. (B) Montage of a SpH-MOR puff colocalizing with VAMP2-pHuji (SpH-MOR in green and VAMP2-pHuji in magenta) from SpH-MOR and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells 5 min after DAMGO treatment at 37°C. Scale bar = 2 µm. (C) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-MOR (cyan) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2+ puff of the SpH-MOR expressing cells. (D) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-B2AR (red) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2-negative puff of the SpH-B2AR expressing cells. (E) Quantification of VAMP enrichment in the population of puffs for each SpH-cargo. VAMP2 or <t>VAMP4</t> enrichment of individual puff event was calculated as the fold change of VAMP-pHuji fluorescence at the peak of the event over baseline SD, as described in the text (median ± 95% confidence interval [CI]; TfR-SpH: 2 cells, puff = 85; SpH-B2AR: 3 cells, puff = 85; SpH-MOR-VAMP2: 3 cells, puff = 59; SpH-MOR-VAMP4: 4 cells, puff = 44; all conditions from two independent experiments). SpH-MOR puffs showed significantly more enrichment of VAMP2 compared with other cargos, but showed no VAMP4 enrichment (one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Kruskal–Wallis test: TfR vs. B2AR: P > 0.9999; TfR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; B2AR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; MOR- VAMP2 vs. MOR-VAMP4: P < 0.0001). (F) The fraction of VAMP2+ puffs (% population) as defined by different folds of VAMP2 enrichment over baseline SD (cutoff) shows a consistent enrichment of VAMP2 preferentially in MOR puffs across all cutoffs. (G) Kernel density estimation of the pooled population of all puffs to estimate subclasses. The best fit predicted three subclasses based on VAMP2 enrichment. Three Gaussian mixture models of the actual distribution (solid line) and predicted subclasses (dashed lines) are shown. (H) Fraction of puffs in each predicted subclass shows distinct population composition of different SpH-cargos and a preferential enrichment of VAMP2+ subclasses in SpH-MOR puffs.
    Vamp4 Sequence, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/vamp4 sequence/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vamp4 sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 2. VAMP2 is detected preferentially in fusion events (puffs) delivering MOR to the surface. (A) Schematic of a VAMP2+ puff in SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells. When a vesicle carrying both SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji fuses to the plasma membrane, the fluorescence intensity increases in both the SpH channel and the pHuji channel. (B) Montage of a SpH-MOR puff colocalizing with VAMP2-pHuji (SpH-MOR in green and VAMP2-pHuji in magenta) from SpH-MOR and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells 5 min after DAMGO treatment at 37°C. Scale bar = 2 µm. (C) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-MOR (cyan) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2+ puff of the SpH-MOR expressing cells. (D) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-B2AR (red) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2-negative puff of the SpH-B2AR expressing cells. (E) Quantification of VAMP enrichment in the population of puffs for each SpH-cargo. VAMP2 or VAMP4 enrichment of individual puff event was calculated as the fold change of VAMP-pHuji fluorescence at the peak of the event over baseline SD, as described in the text (median ± 95% confidence interval [CI]; TfR-SpH: 2 cells, puff = 85; SpH-B2AR: 3 cells, puff = 85; SpH-MOR-VAMP2: 3 cells, puff = 59; SpH-MOR-VAMP4: 4 cells, puff = 44; all conditions from two independent experiments). SpH-MOR puffs showed significantly more enrichment of VAMP2 compared with other cargos, but showed no VAMP4 enrichment (one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Kruskal–Wallis test: TfR vs. B2AR: P > 0.9999; TfR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; B2AR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; MOR- VAMP2 vs. MOR-VAMP4: P < 0.0001). (F) The fraction of VAMP2+ puffs (% population) as defined by different folds of VAMP2 enrichment over baseline SD (cutoff) shows a consistent enrichment of VAMP2 preferentially in MOR puffs across all cutoffs. (G) Kernel density estimation of the pooled population of all puffs to estimate subclasses. The best fit predicted three subclasses based on VAMP2 enrichment. Three Gaussian mixture models of the actual distribution (solid line) and predicted subclasses (dashed lines) are shown. (H) Fraction of puffs in each predicted subclass shows distinct population composition of different SpH-cargos and a preferential enrichment of VAMP2+ subclasses in SpH-MOR puffs.

    Journal: The Journal of cell biology

    Article Title: Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 is a cargo-selective v-SNARE for a subset of GPCRs.

    doi: 10.1083/jcb.202207070

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. VAMP2 is detected preferentially in fusion events (puffs) delivering MOR to the surface. (A) Schematic of a VAMP2+ puff in SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells. When a vesicle carrying both SpH-cargo and VAMP2-pHuji fuses to the plasma membrane, the fluorescence intensity increases in both the SpH channel and the pHuji channel. (B) Montage of a SpH-MOR puff colocalizing with VAMP2-pHuji (SpH-MOR in green and VAMP2-pHuji in magenta) from SpH-MOR and VAMP2-pHuji co-expressing cells 5 min after DAMGO treatment at 37°C. Scale bar = 2 µm. (C) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-MOR (cyan) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2+ puff of the SpH-MOR expressing cells. (D) Representative time-course traces of mean SpH-B2AR (red) and the corresponding mean VAMP2-pHuji fluorescence (magenta) from a VAMP2-negative puff of the SpH-B2AR expressing cells. (E) Quantification of VAMP enrichment in the population of puffs for each SpH-cargo. VAMP2 or VAMP4 enrichment of individual puff event was calculated as the fold change of VAMP-pHuji fluorescence at the peak of the event over baseline SD, as described in the text (median ± 95% confidence interval [CI]; TfR-SpH: 2 cells, puff = 85; SpH-B2AR: 3 cells, puff = 85; SpH-MOR-VAMP2: 3 cells, puff = 59; SpH-MOR-VAMP4: 4 cells, puff = 44; all conditions from two independent experiments). SpH-MOR puffs showed significantly more enrichment of VAMP2 compared with other cargos, but showed no VAMP4 enrichment (one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Kruskal–Wallis test: TfR vs. B2AR: P > 0.9999; TfR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; B2AR vs. MOR: P < 0.0001; MOR- VAMP2 vs. MOR-VAMP4: P < 0.0001). (F) The fraction of VAMP2+ puffs (% population) as defined by different folds of VAMP2 enrichment over baseline SD (cutoff) shows a consistent enrichment of VAMP2 preferentially in MOR puffs across all cutoffs. (G) Kernel density estimation of the pooled population of all puffs to estimate subclasses. The best fit predicted three subclasses based on VAMP2 enrichment. Three Gaussian mixture models of the actual distribution (solid line) and predicted subclasses (dashed lines) are shown. (H) Fraction of puffs in each predicted subclass shows distinct population composition of different SpH-cargos and a preferential enrichment of VAMP2+ subclasses in SpH-MOR puffs.

    Article Snippet: VAMP4-pHuji plasmid expressing human VAMP4 was cloned by first replacing VAMP2 sequence of VAMP2-pHuji with a VAMP4 sequence from EGFP-VAMP4 (a gift from Thierry Galli, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; #42313; Addgene) using XhoI and BamHI sites, and then the stop codon and original linker were replaced by VAMP2-pHuji’s linker.

    Techniques: Expressing, Clinical Proteomics, Membrane, Fluorescence

    Figure 3. VAMP2 depletion inhibits the recycling of SpH-MOR but not that of SpH-B2AR and TfR-SpH. (A) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shScramble-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment. (B) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shVAMP2-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment, showing depletion of VAMP2. Scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Scatter plots of normalized IDoT of VAMP2 immunostaining in shScramble-tagBFP (shScramble) or shVAMP2-tagBFP (shVAMP2) expressing cells (median ± 95% CI, n = 45 or 46 cells, respectively, from two independent experiments), showing depletion of VAMP2 in the latter (P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t test). (D) The number of TfR-SpH puffs per cell per minute (/cell • min) in cells expressing either TfR-SpH alone (Dox alone) or in cells co- expressing shScramble or shVAMP2, treated with 48 h of Dox, show no significant difference (Dox alone: n = 11; shScramble: n = 10; shVAMP2: n = 10, from two independent experiments; one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (E) A similar comparison shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-B2AR puffs across the three conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble + Dox: n = 24; shVamp2 + Dox: n = 36, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (F) A similar comparison shows significant reduction in the number of SpH-MOR puffs in cells co-expressing shVAMP2 compared with the other two conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble: n = 23; shVAMP2: n = 28, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (G) A similar comparison in cells co-expressing SpH-MOR and shScramble or VAMP4 shRNA (shVAMP4), shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-MOR puffs (shScramble, n = 15; shVAMP2, n = 13, from one experiment, unpaired two-tailed t test, checked by power analysis). Cells from E–G were treated with agonists for 5 min at 37°C before imaging. Filled dots in red from E–G represented outliers identified by the Tukey plot that were included in the statistical analysis. “+” in the Tukey plots from D–G represented mean. (H) Schematic of the treatment and labeling conditions for the flow cytometry assay. Cells were labeled with M1-Alexa-647 (M1-647) antibody at the endpoint of treatment conditions to measure surface MOR levels: at baseline (NT), after DAMGO for 20 min at 37°C (T), or after washing out DAMGO and incubating in Naltrexone for 20 min at 37°C (WO). (I) Representative histograms of PC12 cells co-expressing FLAG-MOR and shVAMP2, either without (shVAMP2 −Dox) or with (shVAMP2 +Dox) pretreatment of Dox for 48 h. (J) Quantification of mean (left panel) and geometric mean (geomean, right panel) of surface MOR levels normalized to unlabeled baseline (±SEM, three samples each condition from one experiment).

    Journal: The Journal of cell biology

    Article Title: Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 is a cargo-selective v-SNARE for a subset of GPCRs.

    doi: 10.1083/jcb.202207070

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. VAMP2 depletion inhibits the recycling of SpH-MOR but not that of SpH-B2AR and TfR-SpH. (A) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shScramble-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment. (B) Representative confocal image of PC12 cells expressing shVAMP2-tagBFP (blue) immunostained for endogenous VAMP2 (magenta) after 48 h of Dox treatment, showing depletion of VAMP2. Scale bar = 20 µm. (C) Scatter plots of normalized IDoT of VAMP2 immunostaining in shScramble-tagBFP (shScramble) or shVAMP2-tagBFP (shVAMP2) expressing cells (median ± 95% CI, n = 45 or 46 cells, respectively, from two independent experiments), showing depletion of VAMP2 in the latter (P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t test). (D) The number of TfR-SpH puffs per cell per minute (/cell • min) in cells expressing either TfR-SpH alone (Dox alone) or in cells co- expressing shScramble or shVAMP2, treated with 48 h of Dox, show no significant difference (Dox alone: n = 11; shScramble: n = 10; shVAMP2: n = 10, from two independent experiments; one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (E) A similar comparison shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-B2AR puffs across the three conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble + Dox: n = 24; shVamp2 + Dox: n = 36, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (F) A similar comparison shows significant reduction in the number of SpH-MOR puffs in cells co-expressing shVAMP2 compared with the other two conditions (Dox alone: n = 27; shScramble: n = 23; shVAMP2: n = 28, from three independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey test). (G) A similar comparison in cells co-expressing SpH-MOR and shScramble or VAMP4 shRNA (shVAMP4), shows no difference in the numbers of SpH-MOR puffs (shScramble, n = 15; shVAMP2, n = 13, from one experiment, unpaired two-tailed t test, checked by power analysis). Cells from E–G were treated with agonists for 5 min at 37°C before imaging. Filled dots in red from E–G represented outliers identified by the Tukey plot that were included in the statistical analysis. “+” in the Tukey plots from D–G represented mean. (H) Schematic of the treatment and labeling conditions for the flow cytometry assay. Cells were labeled with M1-Alexa-647 (M1-647) antibody at the endpoint of treatment conditions to measure surface MOR levels: at baseline (NT), after DAMGO for 20 min at 37°C (T), or after washing out DAMGO and incubating in Naltrexone for 20 min at 37°C (WO). (I) Representative histograms of PC12 cells co-expressing FLAG-MOR and shVAMP2, either without (shVAMP2 −Dox) or with (shVAMP2 +Dox) pretreatment of Dox for 48 h. (J) Quantification of mean (left panel) and geometric mean (geomean, right panel) of surface MOR levels normalized to unlabeled baseline (±SEM, three samples each condition from one experiment).

    Article Snippet: VAMP4-pHuji plasmid expressing human VAMP4 was cloned by first replacing VAMP2 sequence of VAMP2-pHuji with a VAMP4 sequence from EGFP-VAMP4 (a gift from Thierry Galli, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; #42313; Addgene) using XhoI and BamHI sites, and then the stop codon and original linker were replaced by VAMP2-pHuji’s linker.

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunostaining, Two Tailed Test, Comparison, shRNA, Imaging, Labeling, Flow Cytometry